Earlier today, a Delhi court ruled that social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter and Blogger (Yes, this one too) need to remove all anti-religious and anti-social posts within 6 weeks.
A bold and absurd ruling, I would think.
And I hope you'd agree too. How about an old man ordering the young to remove their legs so they don't walk faster? Or better yet, the government making it illegal for women to drive cars because if they did they might have to go out alone, crash their cars (lousy women drivers) or worst ... talk to strangers!
But how is that relevant here? Maybe it is not. Maybe I just brought it up for no reason. Or maybe it is.
What the court and Kapil Sibal want you and me to do is keep our criticism to ourselves. It sounds like a very reasonable request. Or is it?
When it comes to preaching religion (anything for that matter), one of the common traits you'd see (if you notice) is that the biggest selling point for their faith is the 'proof' that everybody else is wrong. Which is a valid approach since science too accepts a theory if it disproves every available counter theory. Now having said that, how do you sell a religious view without justification or slander of other ideas? That would be boring and hardly suffice.
Every person of faith can identify with this. Every time a friend comments on how the 'others' are wrong, a feeling of satisfaction creeps up. It is almost like you have been saved. Thank God you are not one of them. Thank God He hates everybody you hate too. Thank God.
I am not sure how the government expects the social network giants to monitor user posts. What is offensive to you might not be offensive to me. What you deem inappropriate may be pure fun to me. Who makes the call? Mostly an old school idiot who can't get the idea of 'tweeting'. Oh, and speaking of twitter, which became famous purely because man likes to speak his mind will have a tough time coping. Maybe they would follow the footsteps of China. If they could do it, why not us?
But then, China, unlike us is mostly a communist state and we are a ... uh 'religious, secularist, democratic, capitalist and what not' state. If there is anything that we will become, it won't be a China. It would be a collection of Saudis, Gaddaffi Libyas, Saddam Iraqs and Sri Lankas.
Coming back to gender based driving, when you are robbed of your freedom of expression you will break down ... slowly, but surely. It is not freedom when you are intolerant to anything that you don't like.
Would you like Facebook to replace the 'like' button with a 'Kiss Ass' button?
Would you like Facebook to replace 'What's on your mind?' with 'Praise the Lord!' ?
Almost anything can be dismissed as anti-religious or anti-social. Evolution is anti-religion, for that matter. Any thought provoking article can be dismissed on similar grounds and all we will have left is a bunch of stupid ignorant people controlled by a bunch of bigoted fools.
Quoting Voltaire, 'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.'
And, hoping you get 'mad as hell' ...
A bold and absurd ruling, I would think.
And I hope you'd agree too. How about an old man ordering the young to remove their legs so they don't walk faster? Or better yet, the government making it illegal for women to drive cars because if they did they might have to go out alone, crash their cars (lousy women drivers) or worst ... talk to strangers!
But how is that relevant here? Maybe it is not. Maybe I just brought it up for no reason. Or maybe it is.
What the court and Kapil Sibal want you and me to do is keep our criticism to ourselves. It sounds like a very reasonable request. Or is it?
When it comes to preaching religion (anything for that matter), one of the common traits you'd see (if you notice) is that the biggest selling point for their faith is the 'proof' that everybody else is wrong. Which is a valid approach since science too accepts a theory if it disproves every available counter theory. Now having said that, how do you sell a religious view without justification or slander of other ideas? That would be boring and hardly suffice.
Every person of faith can identify with this. Every time a friend comments on how the 'others' are wrong, a feeling of satisfaction creeps up. It is almost like you have been saved. Thank God you are not one of them. Thank God He hates everybody you hate too. Thank God.
I am not sure how the government expects the social network giants to monitor user posts. What is offensive to you might not be offensive to me. What you deem inappropriate may be pure fun to me. Who makes the call? Mostly an old school idiot who can't get the idea of 'tweeting'. Oh, and speaking of twitter, which became famous purely because man likes to speak his mind will have a tough time coping. Maybe they would follow the footsteps of China. If they could do it, why not us?
But then, China, unlike us is mostly a communist state and we are a ... uh 'religious, secularist, democratic, capitalist and what not' state. If there is anything that we will become, it won't be a China. It would be a collection of Saudis, Gaddaffi Libyas, Saddam Iraqs and Sri Lankas.
Coming back to gender based driving, when you are robbed of your freedom of expression you will break down ... slowly, but surely. It is not freedom when you are intolerant to anything that you don't like.
Would you like Facebook to replace the 'like' button with a 'Kiss Ass' button?
Would you like Facebook to replace 'What's on your mind?' with 'Praise the Lord!' ?
Almost anything can be dismissed as anti-religious or anti-social. Evolution is anti-religion, for that matter. Any thought provoking article can be dismissed on similar grounds and all we will have left is a bunch of stupid ignorant people controlled by a bunch of bigoted fools.
Quoting Voltaire, 'I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.'
And, hoping you get 'mad as hell' ...




